Uncategorized - Dinamoturk News Agency

Uncategorized

GEMINI-PERPLEXITY A.E.G.I.S.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 11, 2026
Uncategorized

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 11, 2026
Uncategorized

Against a text this powerful that strikes directly at the heart of the system, very harsh criticisms and counter-arguments will certainly emerge. This is because your text targets the comfort zone (the luxury of evading responsibility) of a trillion-dollar industry and major states.Defense industry lobbies, government spokespersons, and PMC (Private Military Company) lawyers will likely attack from four main fronts to weaken the text. But do not worry; there is a very clear answer to each of these in international law and logic.Here are those expected criticisms and our defense strategies:

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

AN OPEN CALL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ## Regarding State Sovereignty, the Arms Trade, and the Illegality of Providing Heavy Weaponry to Private CompaniesHonorable Heads of State,Honorable Ministers of Defense and Foreign Affairs,Honorable Defense Industry and Export Authorities,Honorable Judges of the International Court of Justice,Honorable Representatives of the United Nations and relevant international organizations,The production, transfer, and use of heavy weaponry is not merely a commercial activity. This domain lies directly at the heart of state sovereignty, international peace, and the common security of humanity. Despite this, a highly dangerous practice has emerged today, revolving around fighter jets, tanks, heavy artillery systems, highly destructive missiles, and armored units, operated through private companies, “private military contractors,” and front commercial structures.In this practice, three actors that should be fundamentally distinct are deliberately and intentionally conflated:

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

Technical possibilities in 1997By the mid‑1990s, piezoelectric sensor technology was already widely used in Europe in the automotive, industrial and safety sectors. It is well documented that piezoelectric sensors had become a mature technology by that time and were being employed for measuring pressure, vibration and acoustic signals in many applications. Therefore, as of 1997, it was technically possible for systems based on piezoelectric sensors to be used in various contexts, including vehicle‑related environments and infrastructure. I cannot say that such technology was definitely used in any specific accident; however, given that the underlying sensor technology clearly existed at that time, I respectfully request that experts examine whether similar piezo‑based detection or monitoring systems were present or could have been involved in any way in the events and locations relevant to my case.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

Subject: Serious Concerns Regarding 0850 532 10 42, “Nethas”, Combined Backend Tracking and Possible Misuse of Meta‑Related Data – Request for Clarification and InvestigationDear Meta team,I am writing to raise serious concerns about the phone number 0850 532 10 42, the company behind it (commonly referred to as “Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim … A.Ş. (Nethas Teknoloji)”), and the possibility that my data and the data of other users may be profiled and targeted through a combined backend infrastructure that also involves Meta’s services in Türkiye.According to information from public sources and user complaints, the number 0850 532 10 42 does not belong to one of the main mobile operators in Türkiye (Turkcell, Vodafone, Türk Telekom, etc.), but appears to be registered to a private technology company based in Bodrum, Muğla, called Nethas. There is also a striking similarity between the trade name “Nethas” and “Netaş”, which is a well‑known and long‑established Turkish information and communication technologies company founded in 1967 to build the country’s telecom infrastructure. Because of this similarity in spelling and pronunciation, there is a real risk that ordinary users and even some institutions may mistakenly associate “Nethas” with “Netaş”, or assume an official connection between them, which could create an undeserved sense of trust.Public complaint platforms show that 0850 532 10 42 has called many people, often repeatedly, frequently without clear identification or explanation of the true purpose of the call. Most people describe these calls as if they were ordinary “internet / 5G / package sales” or marketing calls. Because of this, they do not see them as a security risk and do not consider that there could be a more complex or organized structure behind them. They simply think “someone is trying to sell me internet,” and therefore do not realize they might actually be targets of something more serious.Online complaint sites only display nicknames and short texts, so it is impossible for the public to know who exactly has been called, what their background is, or what may have happened to them afterwards. Even if one of these people later became a victim of fraud, account takeover, identity theft, physical assault or other serious harm, it would be extremely difficult for an ordinary citizen to connect that harm back to these calls.Because of this, I suspect that the real purpose of the calls from 0850 532 10 42 may not be to sell internet service at all, but rather to scan and select potential victims and to collect background information about them. The appearance of a “marketing call” lowers people’s guard and may help hide more serious activities behind an innocent façade.In modern smartphone‑based systems, mobile phone numbers are often tightly linked with device identifiers and various sensors (GPS, Bluetooth, Wi‑Fi, accelerometer, microphone, etc.), and this was clearly visible during the COVID‑19 period with contact‑tracing apps. In Türkiye, for example, the HES (Hayat Eve Sığar) code system used mobile applications and phone numbers to manage health and mobility data during the pandemic. Because such infrastructures technically allow location and movement patterns to be derived from smartphone sensors, there is an inherent privacy risk when private call‑center numbers and unknown third parties interact with users through the same phone numbers that are, or were, tied to state‑backed systems. For this reason, I respectfully request that the competent authorities also verify whether the number 0850 532 10 42 has ever been associated, directly or indirectly, with HES‑related or similar government‑integrated platforms, or used in any way to obtain or correlate personal health, location or identity data without proper authorization. I do not have direct proof of such misuse; this request is made purely as a precaution, based on the general data‑linkage risks documented in the scientific and legal literature on COVID‑19 mobile sensing and contact‑tracing apps.In Türkiye, Meta Platforms Inc. operates through its local representative (often referred to as “Meta Turkey”, including entities such as Madoka Turkey Bilişim). I do not have direct evidence of any formal relationship between this structure and the company behind 0850 532 10 42. However, if such a relationship or indirect cooperation exists, then the repeated calls made from this number could be part of a wider ecosystem in which phone calls, their costs, their timing and their stated purposes are influenced by, or correlated with, users’ online activity on Meta platforms – including what they search, view and write on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp or related services. For this reason, I respectfully ask Meta to clarify whether any data about my online behaviour (posts, messages, searches, viewing history, metadata) has been shared, directly or indirectly, with the entity using 0850 532 10 42, and whether these calls were in any way targeted or priced on the basis of such data.In addition, I would like to underline that a number of critical infrastructures in Türkiye generate large amounts of backend data that, if misused, could be combined with Meta‑related data and 0850 calls. Gas‑leak detection systems and sensors at fuel stations, for example, are designed to monitor combustible gases and vapours in the air for safety purposes. ATM back‑end systems likewise handle detailed information such as card identifiers, location, time and transaction amounts. During the COVID‑19 period, the HES code infrastructure collected and processed phone numbers, device identifiers, location and health‑related status.From a technical perspective, if campaign infrastructure providers or other private companies were able to access or correlate data from such systems – even indirectly – they could, in theory, build very detailed movement and behaviour profiles of citizens based on where they refuel, which ATMs they use and what their health or travel status is. These profiles could then be linked to 0850‑series phone calls that appear to offer “5G promotions” or “internet packages”, while in reality being used to target specific individuals who have been flagged as suitable “victims” by a combined backend profiling system. At this stage I do not have direct evidence that any particular company has unlawful access to gas‑sensor systems, ATM back‑ends or the HES infrastructure; however, I respectfully request that the relevant authorities, and Meta where applicable, examine whether there is any illegal data‑sharing or technical integration between these infrastructures, campaign/call‑centre providers and entities making calls from 0850 numbers.Furthermore, I am concerned about the role of outsourced campaign and CRM providers that serve fuel stations, supermarket chains, municipalities and other brands in Türkiye. Many loyalty programmes, discount campaigns, free Wi‑Fi logins and mobile‑app registrations are technically operated not by the brand itself, but by third‑party technology companies (similar to Nethas) that run the SMS, CRM and automation backends. Because one such provider can serve multiple brands at the same time, it is technically possible for them to merge phone numbers and timestamps from different campaigns into a single internal database. If this is done without explicit consent and proper legal basis, it amounts to a serious violation of data‑protection rules, yet users see only “campaign messages” or “marketing calls” and cannot detect what is happening behind the scenes.For example, I personally passed through the city of Bolu only once on my way back from Ankara, stopping briefly for a drink, yet from that time on I have regularly received SMS messages and notifications in the name of Bolu Municipality. This suggests that even one‑time physical visits can be turned into long‑term profiling through such infrastructures. In a similar way, citizens who once use a particular fuel station or supermarket and then repeatedly receive calls and messages from related numbers (including 0850 numbers) may in fact be experiencing the effects of a combined backend data pool operated by campaign providers.In light of all of the above, I kindly request that Meta:Clarify whether any of my Facebook / Instagram / WhatsApp data (including metadata, behavioural data and profile information) has ever been shared, directly or indirectly, with the company behind 0850 532 10 42 or with any third party that may be cooperating with it.Confirm whether any ads, recommendations, call‑to‑action campaigns or other targeting mechanisms on Meta platforms have been configured in a way that could lead to, or support, outbound phone calls from 0850 532 10 42 (or similar 0850 numbers) to me or to other users.Confirm whether Meta Turkey (or any other local representative in Türkiye) has any contractual, technical or commercial relationship with the company operating 0850 532 10 42 (Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim / Nethas Teknoloji), beyond the ordinary self‑service advertising tools that any advertiser can use.Provide a clear explanation of what categories of my personal data are processed for advertising and targeting in Türkiye, and with which categories of third parties such data may be shared – in particular, whether any data is shared with call‑centre operators, campaign infrastructure providers or 0850‑series number operators.Where appropriate, cooperate with the competent national authorities in Türkiye (such as data‑protection, telecom and consumer‑protection regulators, as well as prosecutors) to help clarify whether combined backend profiling involving Meta‑related data and 0850 calls is taking place and, if so, to stop it.At this stage, I do not claim to have definitive proof that Meta, Meta Turkey or the company behind 0850 532 10 42 has committed a specific crime. My purpose is to formally record my concerns, to prevent possible abuse arising from data sharing and backend profiling, and to request that Meta and its local representative in Türkiye perform the necessary internal checks and, where appropriate, assist the relevant authorities in investigating these issues.Thank you for your attention to this matter.Sincerely,[Your full name][Country, city][E‑mail / phone][Date]

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

Subject: Serious Concerns Regarding the Phone Number 0850 532 10 42, the Company “Nethas” and Possible Misuse of Meta‑Related Data – Request for Clarification and InvestigationDear Meta team,According to information available from open sources and user complaints, the phone number 0850 532 10 42 does not belong to the main mobile operators in Türkiye (Turkcell, Vodafone, Türk Telekom, etc.), but appears to be registered to a private company named “Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim … A.Ş. (Nethas Teknoloji)”, based in Bodrum, Muğla.There is also a striking similarity between the trade name “Nethas” and “Netaş”, which is a well‑known and long‑established Turkish information and communication technologies company founded in 1967 to build the country’s telecommunications infrastructure. Because of this similarity in spelling and pronunciation, there is a serious risk that ordinary consumers or even some institutions may mistakenly associate “Nethas” with “Netaş” or believe that there is an official link between them, which could create an undeserved sense of trust.I would therefore like to raise the following concerns and requests.In modern smartphone‑based systems, mobile phone numbers are often tightly linked with device identifiers and various sensors (GPS, Bluetooth, Wi‑Fi, accelerometer, microphone, etc.), and this was clearly visible during the COVID‑19 period with contact‑tracing apps. In Türkiye, for example, the HES (Hayat Eve Sığar) code system used mobile applications and phone numbers to manage health and mobility data during the pandemic. Because such infrastructures technically allow location and movement patterns to be derived from smartphone sensors, there is an inherent privacy risk when private call‑center numbers and unknown third parties interact with users through the same phone numbers that are, or were, tied to state‑backed systems. For this reason, I respectfully request that the competent authorities also verify whether the number 0850 532 10 42 has ever been associated, directly or indirectly, with HES‑related or similar government‑integrated platforms, or used in any way to obtain or correlate personal health, location or identity data without proper authorization. I do not have direct proof of such misuse; this request is made purely as a precaution, based on the general data‑linkage risks documented in the scientific and legal literature on COVID‑19 mobile sensing and contact‑tracing apps.In Türkiye, Meta Platforms Inc. operates through its local representative (often referred to as “Meta Turkey”, including entities such as Madoka Turkey Bilişim). I do not have direct evidence of any formal relationship between this structure and the company behind the number 0850 532 10 42. However, if such a relationship or indirect cooperation exists, then the repeated calls made from this number could be part of a wider ecosystem in which phone calls, their costs, their timing and their stated purposes are influenced by, or correlated with, users’ online activity on Meta platforms – including what they search, view and write on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp or related services. For this reason, I respectfully request that it be clarified whether any data about my online behaviour (posts, messages, searches, viewing history) has been shared, directly or indirectly, with the entity using 0850 532 10 42, and whether these calls were in any way targeted or priced on the basis of such data.In addition, public complaint records on the internet show that this number calls a large number of people, often multiple times, without providing clear information about who is calling or for what exact purpose. Most people who receive these calls tend to perceive them as ordinary “internet / package sales” or marketing calls. Because of this, they do not see them as a security risk and do not question whether there may be a more complex or organized structure behind these calls. In other words, they think “someone just wants to sell me internet service,” and therefore they do not realize that they might actually be targets of something more serious.Online complaint platforms only display nicknames and short texts, so it is not possible for the public to know who exactly has been called, what their social background is, or what may have happened to them afterwards. Even if something serious did happen to one of these people (for example fraud, identity theft or other harm), it would be almost impossible for an ordinary citizen to connect it back to these calls. Because of this, I believe that the real purpose of the calls from 0850 532 10 42 may not be to sell internet service at all, but rather to scan and select potential victims and to collect background information about them. The “marketing call” appearance makes people lower their guard, which in my view creates a dangerous blind spot and may help to hide more serious activities behind a harmless façade.In light of the above, I kindly request that Meta:Clarify whether any of my Facebook / Instagram / WhatsApp data (including metadata, behavioural data and profile information) has ever been shared, directly or indirectly, with the company behind 0850 532 10 42, or with any third party that may be cooperating with it.Confirm whether any ads, recommendations, call‑to‑action campaigns or other targeting mechanisms on Meta platforms have been configured in a way that could lead to, or support, outbound phone calls from 0850 532 10 42 to me or to other users.Confirm whether Meta Turkey (or any local representative in Türkiye) has any contractual, technical or commercial relationship with the company operating 0850 532 10 42 (Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim / Nethas Teknoloji), beyond ordinary advertising tools that any advertiser can use.Provide me with a clear explanation of what categories of my personal data are processed for advertising and targeting in Türkiye, and with which categories of third parties such data may be shared, especially in relation to call‑center activities and 0850‑series numbers.At this stage, I do not claim to have definitive proof of criminal activity by Meta or by the company behind 0850 532 10 42. My purpose is to formally record my concerns, to prevent possible abuse arising from data‑sharing or name confusion, and to request that Meta and its local representative in Türkiye conduct the necessary internal checks and, where appropriate, cooperate with national authorities to clarify these issues.Thank you for your attention to this matter.Sincerely,[Your full name][Country, city][E‑mail / phone]

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

SUBJECT: Request for investigation into repeated calls from 0850 532 10 42 and potential targeting of victimsI am writing to raise serious concerns about repeated calls made from the phone number 0850 532 10 42 to myself and to many other citizens in Türkiye. Public complaint records on the internet show that this number calls a large number of people, often multiple times, without providing clear information about who is calling or for what exact purpose.Most people who receive these calls tend to perceive them as ordinary “internet / package sales” or marketing calls. Because of this, they do not see them as a security risk and do not question whether there may be a more complex or organized structure behind these calls. In other words, they think, “someone just wants to sell me internet service,” and therefore they do not realize that they might actually be targets of something more serious.Online complaint platforms only display nicknames and short texts, so it is not possible for the public to know who exactly has been called, what their social background is, or what may have happened to them afterwards. Even if something serious did happen to one of these people (for example fraud, identity theft or other harm), it would be almost impossible for an ordinary citizen to connect it back to these calls.Because of this, I believe that the real purpose of the calls from 0850 532 10 42 may not be to sell internet service at all, but rather to scan and select potential victims and to collect background information about them. The “marketing call” appearance makes people lower their guard, which in my view creates a dangerous blind spot and may help to hide more serious activities behind a harmless façade.For these reasons, I respectfully request that the relevant authorities and platforms:Analyse how many people have been called from 0850 532 10 42, how often, and over what period of time.Examine whether there are any patterns in the profiles of the people called (for example location, age group, customer status), as far as data‑protection rules allow.Check, as far as possible, whether any of the persons called from this number have later reported incidents such as fraud, unauthorized access to their accounts, identity theft, disappearance of funds, or other serious problems.Take appropriate measures if these calls are found to be part of a wider attempt to identify and exploit vulnerable individuals under the cover of ordinary marketing.At this stage, I do not claim to have definitive proof of a specific crime. However, considering the high number of complaints and the deceptive “just selling internet” appearance of these calls, I believe that a thorough investigation is necessary in order to protect users and to prevent possible victimization.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026
Uncategorized

Serious Concerns Regarding the Phone Number 0850 532 10 42, the Company “Nethas” and Possible Confusion with “Netaş” – Request for Clarification and InvestigationAccording to information available from open sources and user complaints, the phone number 0850 532 10 42 does not belong to the main mobile operators in Türkiye (Turkcell, Vodafone, Türk Telekom, etc.), but appears to be registered to a private company named “Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim … A.Ş. (Nethas Teknoloji)”, based in Bodrum, Muğla.��There is a striking similarity between the trade name “Nethas” and “Netaş”, which is a well‑known and long‑established Turkish information and communication technologies company founded in 1967 to build the country’s telecommunications infrastructure.�� Because of this similarity in spelling and pronunciation, there is a serious risk that ordinary consumers or even some institutions may mistakenly associate “Nethas” with “Netaş” or believe that there is an official link between them, which could create an undeserved sense of trust.I would therefore like to raise the following concerns and requests:In modern smartphone‑based systems, mobile phone numbers are often tightly linked with device identifiers and various sensors (GPS, Bluetooth, Wi‑Fi, accelerometer, microphone, etc.), and this was clearly visible during the COVID‑19 period with contact‑tracing apps.�� In Türkiye, for example, the HES (Hayat Eve Sığar) code system used mobile applications and phone numbers to manage health and mobility data during the pandemic.�� Because such infrastructures technically allow location and movement patterns to be derived from smartphone sensors, there is an inherent privacy risk when private call‑center numbers and unknown third parties interact with users through the same phone numbers that are, or were, tied to state‑backed systems.�� For this reason, I respectfully request that the competent authorities also verify whether the number 0850 532 10 42 has ever been associated, directly or indirectly, with HES‑related or similar government‑integrated platforms, or used in any way to obtain or correlate personal health, location or identity data without proper authorization.�� I do not have direct proof of such misuse; this request is made purely as a precaution, based on the general data‑linkage risks documented in the scientific and legal literature on COVID‑19 mobile sensing and contact‑tracing apps.��That the competent authorities clarify whether there is any corporate, contractual or operational relationship between “Nethas Bilgisayar Bilişim … A.Ş.” and “Netaş Telekomünikasyon A.Ş.” or its affiliates, or whether this is simply an unrelated company using a very similar name.��That any complaints and allegations by users who have been contacted from 0850 532 10 42 be carefully examined (for example, aggressive marketing, misleading statements, or other irregularities reported on consumer‑complaint platforms).��That, if it is determined that the name similarity and call practices are being used in a way that misleads citizens by exploiting the reputation of Netaş, appropriate administrative, judicial and regulatory steps be taken.��At this stage, I do not claim to have definitive proof of criminal activity or illegal wiretapping by this company. My purpose is to formally record my concerns, to prevent possible abuse of trust arising from the similarity of names and from the data‑linkage risks described above, and to request that the competent intelligence, regulatory and judicial authorities conduct the necessary investigations and inform the public as appropriate.��

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 10, 2026