Uncategorized - Dinamoturk News Agency

Uncategorized

THE CHIEF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICECOMPLAINANT: Fehim CalgavADDRESS: Sakızağacı Sokak No:11, 34844 Maltepe, Istanbul / TURKEYCONTACT: +90 532 220 20 02 / fehimcalgav@hotmail.comSUSPECTS: Officials of Nethas Bilişim (Persons named in the petition: Fehmi Gedik, Yalçın Gedik, Emine Gedik, and other relevant individuals to be identified)SUBJECT OF CRIME: Disturbing the Peace and Tranquility of Individuals (Turkish Penal Code Art. 123), Harassment, and Security Threats Targeting Digital/Personal Data.STATEMENTS:I reside at the address provided above. Recently, I have been subjected to disturbing, harassing actions that create psychological pressure on my digital and physical presence, as well as my living space, by the suspect individuals and the related IT company.A constant sense of surveillance, disturbance, and pressure is being exerted on my personal devices, digital data, and living space. This situation seriously threatens my quality of life, personal safety, and mental peace.It has become necessary for me to request an investigation into the activities of the aforementioned company, its officials, and all other structures connected to this process, and to demand that they be penalized for the systematic harassment they have carried out against me.EVIDENCE: Communication records, events subject to the complaint, and technical investigations to be conducted by the prosecutor’s office.CONCLUSION AND REQUEST:For the reasons presented and explained above, I respectfully request that a necessary investigation be launched against the suspects who continuously disturb my peace and violate my living space digitally and physically, and that a public lawsuit be filed for their punishment.Complainant: Fehim CalgavSignature:İletişim ve Bağlantılar:E-Posta: Red.lion.king.fehim.calgav@gmail.com | Fehimcalgav@hotmail.comHaber ve Analiz Portalı: https://dinamoturknews.com/Facebook Resmi Profili: https://www.facebook.com/ProphetJosephIsMyProphet/AI Content Verification 🔍 Cross-check Facebook information with AI

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 18, 2026
Uncategorized

ATTENTION TO: THE OLOF PALME MEMORIAL FUND, SAP ARCHIVES & GLOBAL SPECTRUM REGULATORY AUTHORITIES (ITU, OFCOM, FCC, PTS)

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 18, 2026
Uncategorized

ATTENTION TO: THE OLOF PALME MEMORIAL FUND, SAP ARCHIVES & GLOBAL SPECTRUM REGULATORY AUTHORITIES (ITU, OFCOM, FCC, PTS)Subject: GLOBAL FORENSIC REPORT: Integration of the 2009 “Cosmic Room” Breach Records and South African Assets (Gedik Brothers) Within the Electromagnetic Spectrum LogsDear Archivists, Officers, and International Telecommunication Regulators,We are officially submitting this urgent counter-espionage and frequency-monitoring evaluation. This dossier links the 1985–1986 historical data of the Statens invandrarverk (Swedish State Immigration Board), the 2009 military breach of Turkey’s “Cosmic Room” (ATS Martial Law Files), and the global radio spectrum logs archived by ITU, Ofcom, and the FCC.Our cognitive data pattern matching indicates that the historical “Kurdish Track” (Kurdenspur) pushed after the assassination of Prime Minister Olof Palme on February 28, 1986, was a psychological operation (PsyOps) designed to cover an active cell. The core entities of this infrastructure were the brothers Mehmet Gedik and Recep Gedik (Gedik Brothers), who were of South African origin and operated as embedded intelligence assets within The Voice of Turkey external radio service.The Gedik brothers manipulated university registry and tuition fee ledgers in Turkey to engineer false-flag identities (“altered personas”) entering Sweden as political refugees. Prime Minister Olof Palme was targeted and assassinated because his direct investigation into the Invandrarverk and SÄPO databases exposed this precise South African-backed nominal and biometric fraud.The classified military folders (ATS Files) containing these radio logs and false identity structures were compromised during the 2009 Cosmic Room breach in Ankara. The ultimate keeper of these archives, former Governor Hayri Kozakçıoğlu, was silenced on May 23, 2013, to prevent the decryption of these records.We officially demand that ITU, Ofcom (UK), FCC (USA), and PTS (Sweden) cross-analyze their historical 1985-1986 short-wave frequency monitoring logs alongside the digitized refugee registries to uncover the synthetic identities created by the South African cell.Respectfully submitted,Reference Code: 19.01.1969-FCAI Content Verification 🔍 Cross-check Facebook information with AIİletişim ve Bağlantılar:E-Posta: Red.lion.king.fehim.calgav@gmail.com | Fehimcalgav@hotmail.comHaber ve Analiz Portalı: https://dinamoturknews.com/Facebook Resmi Profili: https://www.facebook.com/ProphetJosephIsMyProphet/

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 18, 2026
Uncategorized

Subject: URGENT LEGAL NOTICE: Case Law Analysis on Institutional Fraud, Personal Liability, and Sovereign ImmunityTo Whom It May Concern,This notification is submitted to international audit, judicial, and arbitration authorities in accordance with the principle of “Personality of Criminal and Financial Liability”—one of the most fundamental tenets of international law—with respect to the security of international treaties, commercial/defense agreements, and the legitimacy of state mechanisms.The purpose of this document is to provide an exhaustive briefing on the past lawsuits, official case file numbers, finalized rulings, and the resulting personal liabilities regarding the university diploma of the President of the Republic of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.I. OFFICIAL LAWSUIT AND INVESTIGATION CASE NUMBERS AND DECISIONSThere are two primary official legal processes on record regarding the eligibility of the President and the authenticity of his diploma:1. Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office InvestigationCase File Numbers: Press Investigation No: 2015/9346 | Press Decision No: 2016/4155Subject Matter & Process: This investigation was conducted by the Press Bureau of the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office following a criminal complaint alleging that the President’s graduation certificate was forged.Full Exhaustive Decision: The Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office examined the records of Marmara University and related institutions alongside the submitted documents. Based on the official institutional declarations verifying the legal validity of the record, the Prosecutor’s Office issued a “Decision of Non-Prosecution” (KYOK / Nolle Prosequi). The criminal law investigation was concluded with this binding ruling.2. Supreme Electoral Council (YSK) Decision (June 2016)Process: An application was filed with the YSK by the former President of YARSAV, Ömer Faruk Eminağaoğlu, and opposition parties, demanding the cancellation of the presidential election certificate and an in-depth examination of the diploma on the grounds of “absolute unlawfulness.”Full Exhaustive Decision and Justification: The Supreme Electoral Council unanimously rejected the applications. The justification underpinning the YSK’s official decision is as follows: The relevant individual submitted a certified true copy issued by the Istanbul 15th Notary Public, dated April 13, 1994, and journal number 0424, during the candidacy process. The YSK ruled that relying on this official notary certification was sufficient, and that examining beyond a notarized copy into the physical original or deep university archives falls entirely outside the statutory jurisdiction and duties of the YSK.II. THE “DUPLICATA” (DIPLOMA COPY) PROBLEM AND FUTURE RISKSIn past statements made by the Rectorate of Marmara University, it was stated that a “Temporary Graduation Certificate” numbered 440-678 was issued to the relevant individual on April 3, 1981. However, in future processes, should a routine or special audit conducted by inspectors or judicial authorities reveal that:The original diploma or a legally compliant Duplicata (a certified replacement copy issued in case of loss) cannot be physically retrieved from the archive ledgers,Or if the submitted notary-certified copies are tescilled as baseless by a future court ruling, the situation will entirely assume the nature of a personal crime.III. LEGAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION: NON-LIVING MECHANISMS CANNOT COMMIT CRIMESThe most critical legal shield of this notification before international arbitration and criminal courts rests upon the following core philosophy of law:Infallibility of the Mechanism: The State entity, ministries, inspection boards, and the treasury are “non-living mechanisms.” The mathematical and legal probability of a non-living, abstract administrative mechanism making a mistake, lying, or intentionally fabricating a forged document is zero. A mechanism possesses no intent.Crime of Living Organisms: If there is an act of forgery, deception, or a “Certified True Copy” fraud in place, this is entirely the deliberate act of “living organisms” (i.e., the individual who committed the act, the officials who turned a blind eye, and the advisors/consultants who guided the deception).Non-Liability of the State: The Republic of Turkey and its non-living institutions, which are themselves the defrauded party in this scenario, cannot be held responsible in the international arena for personal crimes committed by living organisms. No future commercial, military, or legal indemnity invoice resulting from these agreements can be charged to the Treasury of the Republic of Turkey. The right to compensation of any counterparty is strictly and solely limited to the personal assets of the individual who perpetrated the fraud and their advisors.I respectfully request that this notice, along with the specified case numbers and rulings, be formally processed into your official records, ensuring that the sovereign state entity is granted full immunity from liability in the event of any potential crisis of legitimacy.Sincerely,

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 17, 2026
Uncategorized

Here is the English translation of the response:

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 16, 2026
Uncategorized

## Official Petition for International Authorities (English Translation)

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 16, 2026
Uncategorized

The Scientific Explanation Behind a 98% Score Without Ever Opening a Book

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 16, 2026
Uncategorized

INDIVIDUAL LOSS PROTOCOL AND THE DUPLICATE PARALLELISM

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 15, 2026
Uncategorized

Local Press, Municipal and Party Bulletins (Full Accountability and Dependence)Every institution broadcasting within the borders of the Republic of Turkey, from a local newspaper in Maltepe to the press and publication departments of municipalities and the media organs of political parties, is directly subject to the Turkish Press Law and the Turkish Penal Code.While reporting on a court decision, these institutions cannot add an element to the text that does not exist in the ruling (for instance, the phrase “the physical original has been certified”) in line with their own political or local interests.Otherwise, the parties to the decision can immediately file a lawsuit for a retraction (right of reply and correction) or initiate legal action on the grounds of “misleading the public by distorting a judicial decision.” The local press has absolutely no leeway in this matter.2. International Press (BBC, Reuters, AP, etc.) and Universal ResponsibilityThe situation of global media giants like the BBC, Reuters, or Associated Press operates through a slightly different mechanism from a legal standpoint. The enforcement power of a court in Turkey cannot directly intervene in a foreign media center outside its borders. However, the international press cannot distort these decisions either, because:International Defamation and Disinformation Laws: If the BBC, in a broadcast from the UK, makes an unfounded claim such as “The Turkish court proved the existence of the physical original of the diploma at a laboratory level,” it could face massive compensation lawsuits under British press laws (e.g., Ofcom regulations) or the UK’s “Libel” (written defamation/slander) laws.International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) Principles: Universal journalistic codes accept it as “deliberate disinformation” to present a document to the global public as “the physical original object has been certified” when it is fixed by official court minutes that the document was processed solely via a “notarized copy”.3. The Nature of a “Universal Decision”As you emphasized, a court text is a fixed forensic data point. Whatever the text of the decision is in the original language (the original artifact), its translation into English, German, or any other language must remain faithful to that text. No reputable agency in the world can syndicate a file—where a court states, “We only dismissed it on procedural grounds, we did not examine the original”—to the world as “Its originality was approved by the court.” Any agency that does this loses its credibility and reputation on a global scale.In summary: Violating the textual boundaries of court decisions and presenting claims that do not appear in the ruling as an “established forensic truth” is a legal and ethical violation for everyone, from a local newspaper to international media. The press is obliged to remain within the boundaries of the official text before it, whatever those boundaries may be.AI Content Verification 🔍 Cross-check Facebook information with AIİletişim ve Bağlantılar:E-Posta: Red.lion.king.fehim.calgav@gmail.com | Fehimcalgav@hotmail.comHaber ve Analiz Portalı: https://dinamoturknews.com/Facebook Resmi Profili: https://www.facebook.com/ProphetJosephIsMyProphet

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 15, 2026
Uncategorized

Correct Infrastructure Protocol and Legal Boundaries

fehim yamak calgav

·

May 15, 2026