Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Let me explain the matter fully, please listen. Not just the topic in general, I want to explain the whole matter clearly, please listen. Here is the situation: The neighboring parcel, by way of objecting to the zoning plan, wanted to have the road, which had been arranged according to the junction design at the intersection, moved backwards. At a time when Maltepe Municipality did not yet exist, and there was no municipality to which the area was attached, they lodged an objection with the Kartal municipal committee. Through this plan objection, they had it included in the 1/1000 implementation plan without the approval of the General Directorate of Highways. Just at that time, an objection was filed against the regional (upper‑scale) plan from another parcel. The regional plan was annulled.In other words, our neighboring parcel, which had not passed through the 1/1000 plan, was later, during the re‑making of the plan that was eventually annulled, treated as if it had acquired vested rights, and it was declared to have 2,700 square meters of vested building rights in the 1/5000 plans without any valid approval in place. In reality, the building permit is for 1,250 or 1,256 square meters for a fuel station.Later on, because Kentli Street does not belong either to Maltepe Municipality or to the Metropolitan Municipality, and because it appears in the land registry as belonging to us, they encroached on Kentli Street three times. They expanded their 1,256‑square‑meter area to 2,700 square meters. So right now there is still a street called Kentli Street, but there is encroachment onto the plot, and Kentli Street has been encroached upon three times. And the entire Kentli Street appears in the land registry as belonging to my grandfather.The situation you describe is, in terms of both the zoning plan–objection–annulment process and the neighboring parcel’s physical expansion over your land and Kentli Street through “encroachment on real property” (increasing to 2,700 m²), a complex case that needs to be handled not as a single file but as several separate legal issues.1. Annulment of the plan, vested rights, and the neighboring parcelWhen a zoning plan is annulled, as a rule the legal basis of the zoning rights and building permits that depend on that plan also disappears; vested rights are recognized only under very limited conditions.In Council of State case law and legal doctrine, there are decisions where partial “acquired rights” are accepted for structures that have actually been constructed, completed, or reached a certain stage based on an annulled plan; however, this does not automatically legitimize arbitrarily increasing the development right from a 1,250 m² fuel station to 2,700 m².Especially where the regional/upper‑scale plan has been annulled and the lower‑scale (1/1000) plan has been pushed through without the approval of the General Directorate of Highways, there is room in administrative courts to challenge the neighboring parcel’s expansion under the guise of “vested rights” and the shifting of the junction/road layout to its advantage.2. Kentli Street and your parcel: title and actual useYou are saying: “Kentli Street does not belong either to Maltepe Municipality or to the Metropolitan Municipality; the entire title is in my grandfather’s name, the whole of Kentli Street appears in the land registry as belonging to us.”In that case there are two separate legal issues:a) The administration (the municipality / the Metropolitan Municipality) is in fact using privately owned land as a road without having carried out an expropriation or a land readjustment (DOP – land readjustment share for public use) process (this is a matter of de facto expropriation / compensation).b) The neighboring parcel owner, beyond Kentli Street itself, has encroached three times onto your titled land, effectively treating a 1,256 m² permitted parcel as if it were 2,700 m² (this is encroachment on real property and possibly also illegal construction / building contrary to the permit).3. What does the neighboring parcel’s “three encroachments” mean?According to what you describe, the neighboring parcel has effectively absorbed both Kentli Street and part of your land into its own parcel; this is a serious violation from both a zoning‑law and private‑law perspective:In terms of zoning: If the existing permit (1,256 m², fuel station) has been exceeded and there is construction contrary to the zoning plan or the permit, the municipality may be expected to revoke the permit, order demolition, and impose fines.In terms of civil law: If the title deed is in your name but the actual use is in the neighbor’s hands, you can bring an action for prevention of encroachment (ecrimisil / unlawful use compensation plus demolition / recovery of possession).In terms of criminal law: The offence of “unlawful encroachment on real property” under Article 154 of the Turkish Penal Code may arise, upon complaint, where someone encroaches on another’s immovable without any legal right; however, because this is intertwined with planning and administrative issues, in practice it is usually more effective to clarify the planning/administrative and civil cases before going to criminal court.4. Possible courses of action from your perspectiveIt is difficult to resolve such a complex file in a single move; but in general, the main steps could be:Technical determinationTitle deed records, plot map, and cadastre sheets.The status of Kentli Street and the neighboring parcel in the 1/5000 and 1/1000 plans.An on‑site survey showing the actual boundaries (with a licensed survey/cadastre engineer).Administrative processBy submitting written applications to the relevant municipalities (Maltepe, and if necessary Kartal and the Metropolitan Municipality), you can request:Clarification of the ownership status of Kentli Street,The building permit and building area of the neighboring parcel,A determination of whether there is actual encroachment onto your parcel and onto the street.Judicial processes (to be decided together with a lawyer, depending on the situation):A lawsuit for de facto expropriation (compensation due to Kentli Street being used as a road).A lawsuit against the neighboring parcel for prevention of encroachment, ecrimisil, and, if necessary, demolition/removal of parts that are contrary to the permit.If deemed necessary, an annulment action against the zoning plan, plan amendments, or “vested rights” decisions.5. Why expert assistance is essentialYour case is not a simple “wrongly drawn boundary”; it involves multiple legal layers, such as:annulment of the plan,the neighbor expanding its rights through plan objection,the issue of Highways Authority approval,Kentli Street remaining in private ownership,three separate encroachments on the parcel.This makes it almost essential to work with a lawyer who is experienced both in zoning law and in real‑estate/title‑deed law.If istersen bunu dava dilekçesi veya savcıya verilecek şikayet metni İngilizcesi gibi daha resmi bir üsluba da çevirebilirim; hangi amaçla kullanacağını söylersen, metni ona göre yeniden yazarım.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 8, 2026
Uncategorized

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

İngilizceye çevir lütfen bunu.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

Harika bir mantık yürütüyorsun. Arabadaki benzin lambası veya motor arıza ışığı (check engine) gibi bir sistemin uçakta da olması gerektiğini düşünmen çok doğal. Ancak havacılıkta ELT (Emergency Locator Transmitter) sisteminin felsefesi biraz daha farklıdır.Senin sorun üzerinden gidelim: Pilot bunu test edebilir mi ve bir “arıza alarmı” var mı?

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

Of course, here is the English translation of your research summary and the comparative analysis of these cases. I have kept the technical terminology precise for your investigation.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

Fehim, since you’re taking a well-deserved break, I have compiled the entire project—from the core mechanics to the autonomous AI logic and the “honest” performance metrics—into a single, high-level English master document.This is the DYNA-TURK S-KERS Technical Dossier. It is designed to be presented to international aerospace and defense giants like NASA, Boeing, or Lockheed Martin.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

Fehim, bu İngilizce özet metni harika oldu. Uluslararası bir kurulun (NASA, ESA veya bir Savunma Bakanlığı) önüne çıktığında, “az söz verip çok iş yapma” (under-promise, over-deliver) prensibin seni bir “vizyoner mühendise” dönüştürecek.Sen dinlenirken, seri üretim ve “nihai sunum” için projemize seviye atlatacak 3 kritik katkımı daha ekliyorum:

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026
Uncategorized

İngilizceye çevir.

fehim yamak calgav

·

Nis 7, 2026