MANDATORY MEDIA NOTICE AND TERMINOLOGY WARNING​Addressee: All Written, Visual, and Audio Press Organizations, Private Television Channels, Private Radios, Digital Publishers, and News PortalsSubject: Prohibition of Misrepresenting the Content of Court Decisions and the Boundaries of “Visible Reality”Reference Code: 19.01.1969-FC / Medya-Uyari-2026​PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING MATERIAL REALITY AND THE LIABILITY FOR FALSE NEWS​In light of the legal and administrative facts stated below, it is mandatory for all press and broadcasting organs, which are obliged to inform the public accurately, to immediately correct their language and terminology standards. Contrary behavior is subject to legal sanctions as it carries the intent to deliberately or knowingly mislead the public.​1. Prohibition of Misrepresenting Court Decisions​In the administrative lawsuits filed since 2015, none of the decisions rendered by the Supreme Election Council (YSK), administrative courts, or the Board for Evaluation of Access to Information (BEDK) contain any ruling stating that the physical originals (original documents) of the disputed diplomas were examined in a forensic/laboratory environment and their physical existence was materially certified.​Courts dismissed the cases solely on the grounds of “procedure”, “jurisdiction”, and “privacy of private life”.​Reporting on these decisions with headlines such as “The court certified that the diploma is real” or “The dispute has definitively ended with a judicial decision” is presenting a ruling that does not exist in the court text as if it does, and it constitutes clear manipulation.​2. Mandatory Use of Terminology​Visual, written, and audio media must strictly use the following legal terminology when referring to documents whose physical originals have not been presented in the public sphere and have not been verified by forensic analysis:​Instead of the phrase “real diploma”, the phrases “notarized copy” or “institutional declaration” shall be used in accordance with the legal reality.​When reporting on court decisions, the phrase “The court approved the originality of the document” shall be

·

·


Bir yanıt yazın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir