İngilizceye çevir. makale Makale formatında.

Here is an English, article-style version of the core text we built (you can edit details, add citations later):

---

1. Closed Settings, Intensive Care and Instrumented Cases

The most reliable data on what happens near the moment of death come from intensive care and neurology units, where patients’ brains are monitored with instruments such as EEG. In these recordings, just before and just after cardiac arrest, a marked increase has been observed particularly in gamma oscillations. This gamma activity also appears during wakeful states involving intense thinking, memory recall and dreaming, which has led some researchers to suggest that, at the moment of death, the brain may be “rapidly reviewing consciousness and memories one last time.”

This finding objectively supports the idea that there is a “storm” in brain networks related to memory and consciousness at the time of death. However, these instruments only record the intensity and rhythm of electrical activity; they do not directly show whether the patient actually “saw their life flash before their eyes,” nor which specific scenes were experienced. The content of the experience still depends on the patient’s subsequent subjective report.

Imaging techniques such as CT and MRI show the structure of the brain and its blood flow; they do not capture which scene or which memory is being experienced. Therefore, recordings obtained in closed hospital settings demonstrate the fact that “as the brain is dying, circuits related to memory and consciousness can be strongly activated,” while the metaphor of a “movie of one’s life” is a human interpretation of this activity.

---

2. Cars, Accidents and the Issue of Closed Spaces

In cases of sudden traffic accidents, falls from height, explosions and similar events, reports of “time slowing down” and “my whole life flashed before my eyes” are quite frequent. In the vast majority of these cases, there is no EEG or similar instrument attached at the moment of the incident; thus we have no direct brain recordings from the critical second itself. Instead, our information comes from:

• The survivor’s narrative of the experience, and
• General physiological knowledge about injured brains (shock, adrenaline surges, distortion of time perception, approaching hypoxia, etc.).

The dominance of “closed spaces” in the literature largely reflects where instruments are used: hospital environments such as intensive care units, operating rooms and monitoring rooms. Events that occur in open spaces (on the road, at sea, outdoors) are usually recorded only at the level of oral reports, if the person survives.

Thus we can summarize:

• Intensive care + EEG/CT/MRI → strong neurobiological evidence.
• Accident scene + narrative only → phenomenologically consistent, but instrumentally weaker evidence.

Nevertheless, the fact that similar narratives appear across many accident survivors from different countries and cultures makes it scientifically difficult to dismiss the experience as pure fabrication or mere storytelling.

---

3. Psychiatry and Psychological Practice Settings

Some of the “my life flashed before my eyes” experiences reported in psychiatric or psychological practice do not occur at the actual biological threshold of death. Rather, they are associated with situations in which the brain’s perception is severely altered but the person is not, from a medical standpoint, in imminent lethal danger. Examples include:

• Severe panic attacks and intense anxiety,
• Dissociative episodes (a sense of detachment from reality or self),
• Substance and alcohol effects (especially agents that distort perception and time),
• Psychotic episodes (conditions where reality testing is impaired).

In these conditions, the neurochemical and network state of the brain can produce a powerful subjective feeling of being under extreme threat, or even “about to die,” despite the absence of actual critical organ failure. Time may appear to slow down, scenes from the past may resurface as flashbacks, and clusters of images and sounds may “flow” rapidly. People often compress this complex experience into a simple narrative formula in everyday language: “I thought I was dying, and my whole life passed before my eyes.”

In such clinical settings, continuous EEG or advanced imaging is rarely used for every case; assessments rely primarily on clinical observation and patient history. As a result, the data here are more subjective than those from instrumented intensive care cases. Nonetheless, it is well established in neuropsychiatry that panic, trauma and psychoactive substances can distort perception and time and can trigger intense memory recall. Consequently, these reports cannot be dismissed as “pure invention without any biological basis,” but they must be distinguished conceptually from near-death experiences occurring at the actual threshold of biological death.

---

4. Hallucination, Oxygen Deprivation and the Sense of “Crushing Weight”

Decreasing oxygen supply to the brain (hypoxia) and reduced cerebral perfusion can distort time perception and cause visual and auditory hallucinations both at the time of death and during severe drowning, cardiac arrest or serious arrhythmias. In such processes:

• The person may feel chest tightness, a “crushing weight” on the body and an inability to breathe.
• The visual field may narrow and tunnel-like images, bright lights or scenes from the past may appear.
• Objective time may be only seconds, but subjectively it may feel much longer or oddly “slowed down.”

These states can overlap with or resemble the effects of certain psychoactive drugs. For example:

• Sedative–hypnotic agents,
• Hallucinogenic substances,
• High doses or combinations of alcohol and other drugs

can induce bodily heaviness, pressure, detachment from reality and visual–auditory distortions even in the absence of true life-threatening organ failure. The individual may later frame this experience using a culturally familiar pattern, especially the powerful “death template,” and describe it as “I almost died; my life flashed before my eyes.”

From this perspective:

• Some “life flashing before the eyes” narratives may indeed reflect neural activity very close to the biological limit of death.
• Other cases may be the product of pharmacological (drug/medication), psychological (severe anxiety, trauma) and perceptual disturbances, phenomenologically similar to hallucinations, without an actual near-fatal event.
• In the latter group, the person need not be consciously lying; they report an experience that felt real at the time. However, neurophysiologically, this differs from a true near-death event at the edge of cardiac or respiratory collapse.

---

5. A More Balanced Academic Conclusion

The core idea you expressed can be reformulated in a more academic and balanced way as follows:

1. Instrumented, closed-setting cases (especially patients monitored with EEG in intensive care units) provide measurable evidence that, near the time of death, there is intense activation in brain networks associated with consciousness and memory. This supports the neurobiological plausibility of the “life review” component reported in some near-death experiences.
2. However, these instruments do not record the subjective content of experience; they cannot verify or falsify the specific metaphor of a “movie of one’s life.” That metaphor is a narrative representation of the underlying neural dynamics as experienced from the first-person perspective.
3. Reports of “my life flashed before my eyes” during traffic accidents, drowning and other acute traumas recur across different cultures and contexts and therefore cannot be dismissed wholesale as fabrication. At the same time, in most of these events there are no contemporaneous brain recordings, which limits the strength of objective confirmation.
4. Psychiatric crises, severe panic attacks, substance and alcohol use and certain medications can generate experiences that resemble the “life flashing before the eyes” phenomenon, via distortions in perception, time and memory. These episodes are explainable at neurobiological and psychological levels but do not always meet the criteria for a near-death experience in the strict medical sense.
5. Consequently, a rigid dichotomy such as “all closed-setting, instrumented cases are purely scientific truth, and all other reports are hallucination or lies” does not fully accord with current evidence. A more accurate approach is to regard “life movie” narratives across contexts as different manifestations of shared underlying mechanisms—stress responses, hypoxia, altered time perception and memory network activation—while evaluating each individual report within its specific clinical and situational context.

---

If you tell me the target journal or field (neurology, psychiatry, consciousness studies, etc.), I can adapt this into a full IMRAD-style structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) with more formal phrasing.