To the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Turkey(To be Submitted to the Political Parties Department of the General Directorate of Civil Society Relations)SUBJECT: Regarding the request for registration of the political party establishment notification submitted by my singular will, by deeming the numerical threshold of “Established by at least thirty Turkish citizens” in Article 8 of Law No. 2820 on Political Parties (SPK) null and void in light of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, and universal legal principles.1. LEGAL BASIS: UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (30 ARTICLES)All 30 articles of the UDHR define the subject of rights not as collective groups, but as “Everyone” (the Individual).Article 21: “Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.”Legal Engineering: This article does not condition the right to be elected on a prerequisite of “finding 30 people.” A single individual’s political vision represents the upper limit of freedom of expression (Art. 19) and freedom of association (Art. 20). Confining this right to a number directly contradicts the provision in Article 30 of the Declaration that “no State… may engage in any activity… aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.”2. HISTORICAL REGRESSION AND ARBITRARINESS ANALYSISThe freedom of association in Turkey has undergone historical erosion:1909 Associations Law: Political associations (parties) could be established by just 7 people.Limitation Since 1983: Since 1983, without any rational, scientific, or legal justification, this number has been raised to 30, placing individual wills under mortgage.Result: The transition from the freedom-oriented environment of 1909 to the prohibitive bureaucracy of 2026 is a legal regression incompatible with the “Democratic Rule of Law” principle.3. ADMINISTRATIVE PARADOX: TAX NUMBER AND LEGAL ENTITY LOGICIn our legal system, legal personality arises from a declaration of will:Foundation and LTD Company Example: A single person dedicating assets (Foundation) or taking commercial risk (LTD Company) can acquire legal personality alone.Tax Number Contradiction: No tax number is required in the initial application; because the tax number is not a prerequisite for establishment, but its result.Argument: Demanding “30 people” at the beginning for an identity (Tax No.) formed as a result of establishment is technically flawed. If the state can issue a tax number to one person and say “you are a legal entity,” rejecting this for political parties violates the equality principle (Constitution Art. 10).4. 83 MILLION INDIVIDUAL VOTER RIGHTS: VIOLATION OF SINGULAR HUMAN RIGHTSThe most critical point of this objection is not only the founder’s right, but the singular human right of each of the 83 million citizens. 83 million is not a “herd number,” “vote base,” or collective mass from polls; it consists of individuals whose individual voting freedoms have been usurped since 1983 under SPK Art. 8:Intervention in Individual Right to Vote: Pursuant to UDHR Art. 21 and Constitution Art. 67, every voter has the right to their own free will to vote for the political vision of their choice. Blocking a political initiative by saying “you couldn’t find 30 people” is a violation of this singular right for every individual with potential support for that initiative.Mortgage on National Will: By preventing one person’s vision from being presented to 83 million individuals, the state is censoring each voter’s individual choice freedom. Whether each of the 83 million chooses that single person is to be decided not by administrative officials, but by that individual’s own will at the ballot box. This is a rights violation ongoing since 1983; laws must be interpreted not through poll “vote base” logic, but through the spirit of the UDHR centering the individual.CONCLUSION AND REQUESTPolitical parties are indispensable elements of democracy (Constitution Art. 68). However, what is “indispensable” is not parties, but the individual will of the people. Within the framework of:The spirit of the UDHR’s 30 articles centering the individual,The 30-person limitation usurping individual rights since 1983,The natural flow of the “Offer-Acceptance” (Icap-Kabul) principle,The violation of each of the 83 million voters’ singular right to vote freely,Administrative contradictions in tax number and legal entity logic,I request and demand that the 30-person requirement in SPK Art. 8 not be applied in my case; that the political party establishment notification submitted by my singular will be accepted and registration proceedings initiated; and that legal personality identity (along with Tax Number) be granted to me.I respectfully request that the necessary actions be taken to break the individual shackles on the national will.Respectfully,[Your Name Surname][T.C. ID No][Signature][Date: 06.04.2026]